SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.02279

Counting Hamiltonian paths between prescribed vertices in traceable graphs with a forbidden induced subgraph

Abstract

For graphs $G$ and $F$, we say that $G$ is $F$-free if $F$ does not occur as an induced subgraph of $G$. This paper is concerned with the following question: Given an $F$-free graph $G$ having two vertices between which there exists at least one Hamiltonian path, how many Hamiltonian paths between these endpoints must exist (in terms of the order of $G$)? Our main result shows that there exists a sharp dichotomy. More precisely, we show that if $F$ is not an induced subgraph of $P_3+sP_1$ for any integer $s \geq 0$, then there exists an infinite family of $F$-free graphs having two vertices between which there exists a unique Hamiltonian path. On the other hand, we prove that if $F$ is an induced subgraph of $P_3+sP_1$ for some integer $s \geq 0$, then any $F$-free graph having two vertices between which there exists a Hamiltonian path contains exponentially many such paths between these two vertices. Our proofs use Ramsey-theoretic methods, a result on the existence of two vertices with low degree in graphs containing a unique Hamiltonian cycle, a path variant of Thomassen's red-independent weakly green-dominating sets, and a structural analysis of Hamiltonian paths in $P_3+sP_1$-free graphs. As an algorithmic consequence we obtain that for every fixed $s \geq 1$, given a Hamiltonian $sP_1$-free graph together with a Hamiltonian cycle, one can decide in linear time whether a second Hamiltonian cycle exists and construct one if it does.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jorik Jooken, Carol T. Zamfirescu. 2026-06-01. Counting Hamiltonian paths between prescribed vertices in traceable graphs with a forbidden induced subgraph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02279

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Balanced even cycles in signed graphs:Tur\'an bounds, double covers, and parity obstructions

We study Tur\'an problems for balanced even cycles in simple signed graphs, where signed subgraphs are considered up to switching. For every balanced bipartite signed graph, the signed and ordinary Tur\'an numbers differ by at most a factor of two. Our main structural results concern the underlying graphs that admit a signing in which every $2k$-cycle is unbalanced. We characterize these graphs by the absence of an odd dependence among their $2k$-cycle incidence vectors, give a cohomological formulation, and construct subgraph-minimal obstructions of arbitrarily large order. In particular, there is no finite forbidden-subgraph characterization. We also give an exact closed-walk criterion for cycles in double covers and derive a direct signed breadth-first-search upper bound. As applications, we prove \[ \hex(n,C_{+4})=\left(\frac{\sqrt2}{2}+o(1)\right)n^{3/2} \] and study the signed hexagon number $R_6(n)=\hex(n,\{C_{-3},C_{+6}\})$. We characterize the underlying graphs counted by $R_6$ and express it as an extremal problem for ordinary $C_6$-free graphs with a prescribed involution. For every sufficiently large $n$, we construct examples with $\Omega(n^{4/3})$ edges, and we give an equivariant construction attaining the coefficient obtained from the F\"uredi--Naor--Verstra\"ete lower bound by double-cover transfer. Finally, we give $n$-vertex $C_{+10}$-free signed graphs with $\Omega(n^{6/5})$ edges and use octagon examples to illustrate the limitations of theta-freeness as a signing criterion.

math.CO

Fractional DP-colorings of $d$-degenerate locally sparse graphs

Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu (2020) introduced the notion of fractional DP-coloring, which generalizes both fractional coloring and fractional list coloring. Among several foundational results, they proved that every $d$-degenerate bipartite graph $G$ satisfies $\chi_f^{\mathrm{DP}} \le (1 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log d}$, and that this bound is optimal---a stark contrast to ordinary fractional coloring. In this paper, we extend this upper bound to all $d$-degenerate triangle-free graphs, proving that $\chi_f^{\mathrm{DP}} \le (4 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log d}$. This generalizes a recent result of Martinsson and Steiner (2025) for ordinary fractional coloring. We derive this result as a corollary of a more general upper bound concerning locally sparse graph orderings. Specifically, a $d$-degenerate graph $G$ is left $k$-locally-sparse if it admits a degeneracy ordering in which, for every vertex $v$, the subgraph induced by its back-neighbors contains at most $k$ edges. We show that if a $d$-degenerate graph $G$ is left $\frac{d^2}{f}$-locally-sparse, then \[ \chi_f^{\mathrm{DP}}(G) \le (8 + o(1))\frac{d}{\log f}. \] This immediately yields an identical upper bound on the ordinary fractional chromatic number $\chi_f(G)$, improving upon the leading constants of previously known bounds. Additionally, we establish the asymptotic sharpness of this result up to the leading constant. For any $1 \ll f \le d^2$, we construct $d$-degenerate graphs that are left $\frac{d^2}{f}$-locally-sparse and satisfy $\chi_f(G) \ge (1 - o(1))\frac{d}{\log f}$. Finally, as applications of our main theorem, we obtain improved upper bounds on the fractional DP-chromatic number of $d$-degenerate $K_{1,t,t}$-free graphs, as well as $K_{t,t,t}$-free graphs with maximum degree $\Delta$. Notably, these bounds improve upon existing results even in the setting of ordinary fractional coloring.

math.CO

Erd\H{o}s-S\'{o}s for digraphs

It is shown that every Eulerian digraph on $n$ vertices with more than $(t-1)n$ arcs contains every oriented tree with $t$ edges. The digraphs have no loops or repeated arcs, but opposite arcs are permitted. The bound is sharp for each fixed oriented tree, as witnessed by disjoint unions of complete bidirected graphs. Previously, such tight bounds were not known, even just for directed paths. This can be considered as a directed analog of the recently proved Erd\H{o}s-S\'os conjecture. The result was proved by GPT-6 Astra.

math.CO