arXiv · 2606.02430
Not All Errors Are Equal: A Systematic Study of Error Propagation in Large Language Model Inference
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into high-performance computing (HPC) workflows, accelerating scientific discovery through diverse perspectives such as code generation and domain-specific decision-making. Yet, how soft errors propagate and affect LLM inference remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we present a comprehensive study on error propagation in LLM inference, enabled by our proposed LLMFI, a configurable and deterministic fault-injection framework. Using LLMFI, we systematically inject faults across three open-weighted LLMs and thirteen representative tasks, covering reasoning, multilingual, mathematical, and coding domains. In addition, we conduct fine-grained case studies that reveal critical vulnerability patterns. Overall, our study yields 17 takeaways that advance the understanding of error propagation in LLM inference and introduces four low-overhead directions to improve reliability through software-only modification, offering practical guidance for future error detection and mitigation.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Yafan Huang, Sheng Di, Guanpeng Li. 2026-06-01. Not All Errors Are Equal: A Systematic Study of Error Propagation in Large Language Model Inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02430
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.