Welfare-Optimal Classification with Accuracy Auctions

Abstract

Prediction algorithms are increasingly used to inform decisions about humans, but maximizing accuracy-the standard learning objective-is not necessarily optimal for this purpose. Instead, we propose optimizing social welfare, defined as the average gain users receive from correct predictions. Welfare enables to express, and therefore account for, heterogeneity in how much users benefit from accuracy. But since these valuations are private and users can benefit from overreporting them, learning must simultaneously elicit truthful values and optimize welfare with respect to them. To this end, we propose a novel learning algorithm that incorporates a truthful auction. We show how to compute allocations and prices efficiently, and bound the number of paying users-which surprisingly is independent of the sample size. We conclude with experiments on real and synthetic data that demonstrate our algorithm and explore the connections between welfare and accuracy.