SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.05211

The Euclidean algorithm, lotuses and singularities

Abstract

The anthyphairetic process leads from a pair (a,b) of coprime positive integers to the pair (1,1) by successive subtractions of the smaller number from the bigger one. This process, which is a slow version of Euclid's algorithm applied to the pair (a,b), corresponds naturally to the process of successive blowups leading to the minimal embedded resolution of the plane curve defined by y^a - x^b = 0. This blowup process may be represented graphically by a special two-dimensional simplicial complex called a lotus. This allows to localize the various numbers appearing either during the anthyphairetic process or during the Euclidean algorithm at precise positions inside the lotus. In this introductory article, I recall first the construction of this lotus starting from the sequence of quotients generated by the Euclidean algorithm. I present then an alternative way of constructing it directly from the sequence of pairs of coprime integers generated by the anthyphairetic process, using what I call anthyphairetic rectangles. I conclude by explaining how to reconstruct from a lotus the corresponding sequence of pairs of coprime integers. This is a simple illustration of the way lotuses may serve as computational architectures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Patrick Popescu-Pampu. 2026-05-26. The Euclidean algorithm, lotuses and singularities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05211

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO