Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.05345

PJ-RoPE: A Fourier-Jet-Affine Position Space for Relative Attention

Yaobo Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We organize relative-position mechanisms in attention as a learnable Fourier-Jet-Affine position space. The starting point is lag-shift dynamics: a relative-position kernel is a response function of the lag \(d=i-j\), and the one-step shift \((Ef)(d)=f(d+1)\) gives a compact classification of finite structured responses through constant-coefficient difference modules. In this view, RoPE supplies simple Fourier roots, Jordan-RoPE thickens these roots into finite Fourier jets, and ALiBi supplies the repeated unit-root affine direction. NTK-aware RoPE scaling fits the same structure as a spectral flow of simple Fourier roots: moving the frequency grid generates first Fourier-jet tangent directions, while higher Taylor directions generate higher jets. PJ-RoPE makes these jet directions explicit and learnable, and uses the resulting space to measure task-level sector selection. The framework separates scalar PJ-bias kernels from exact PJ-rotary feature transforms, introduces sector-gate, effective-mass, functional-energy, and leave-one-order-out diagnostics, and stabilizes high-order coordinates with LC/rapidity compactification. Controlled probes recover designed sectors; synthetic teachers show trainable use; small byte-level language runs favor NTK-aware RoPE plus affine recency; symbolic music-token streams keep LC/affine variants strong with measurable high-order corrections; and LC diagnostics quantify the stability-resolution tradeoff.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yaobo Zhang. 2026-06-03. PJ-RoPE: A Fourier-Jet-Affine Position Space for Relative Attention. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05345

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗