SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.06699

Robust inference for cyclic-stress accelerated life tests under interval monitoring with lognormal lifetimes

Abstract

Highly reliable products are often tested under accelerated conditions to provoke failures within a feasible timeframe. For products whose service life involves repeated alternation between two stress levels, such as automotive air-conditioners, batteries, and aerospace components, cyclic-stress accelerated life testing (CyALT) provides a more realistic loading profile than conventional accelerated tests. In practice, failures are often recorded only at scheduled inspection times, leading to interval-censored counts rather than exact lifetimes. Moreover, traditional maximum likelihood estimation is sensitive to data contamination, which is a genuine concern in small-sample industrial experiments. This paper develops robust inferential procedures for CyALT models with lognormal lifetimes under interval monitoring. Robust estimators are obtained by minimizing a weighted density power divergence (WDPD), leading to the weighted minimum density power divergence estimator (WMDPDE). We establish the asymptotic distribution of the WMDPDE, derive influence function expressions to characterize the robustness, and present asymptotic and bootstrap confidence intervals for important lifetime characteristics. A simulation study confirms that the WMDPDE provides substantial protection against outliers while retaining high efficiency under clean data. The methodology is illustrated through the analysis of an air-conditioner reliability dataset, demonstrating the practical advantages of robust inference in the CyALT framework.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

María Jaenada, Leandro Pardo, Kiran Prajapat. 2026-06-04. Robust inference for cyclic-stress accelerated life tests under interval monitoring with lognormal lifetimes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06699

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME