SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.08412

Complexity and Algorithms for Unary Translocation Distance

Abstract

Given a finite set of integers $A$, a \emph{unary translocation} produces a new set $A' = A \cup \{u,v\}$, where $u$ and $v$ are nonnegative integers satisfying $x+y=u+v$ for some $x,y\in A$. For an input set $A$ and a target set $B$, the \emph{unary translocation distance} is the minimum number of unary translocations required to obtain a superset containing $B$. In this paper, we study this problem from both theoretical and computational perspectives. We prove that computing the unary translocation distance is strongly NP-hard, thereby answering an open question raised by \citet{ConstantinMiclausPopa2026UnaryTranslocation}. On the positive side, we give an exact pseudo-polynomial algorithm for every fixed constant value of $|B|$, extending our previous results for $|B|\leq 2$. For arbitrary target sets, we present a $2$-approximation algorithm, an additive $(|B|-1)$-approximation algorithm, and show that the additive algorithm also yields a $3$-approximation. We also propose parameterized algorithms, including algorithms parameterized by the maximum value in the input set together with the optimum distance, and by the maximum value in the target set together with $|B|$. In addition, we propose an integer linear programming formulation that gives an exact mathematical model for the problem, analyze its size, and show that the LP relaxation has integrality gap at least $\frac{4}{3}$. Finally, we report computational experiments comparing the $2$-approximation algorithm, beam search, and simulated annealing. The results show that the approximation algorithm is highly effective in practice and often outperforms the heuristic baselines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria Constantin, Adrian Miclăuş, Alexandru Popa, Andrei Popa. 2026-06-07. Complexity and Algorithms for Unary Translocation Distance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08412

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS