SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.09565

STON'R Converges to First-Order Nash~Equilibria of Multiplayer Games

Abstract

Nonconcave games present a unique challenge, as neither pure Nash equilibria nor local Nash equilibria (LNE) are guaranteed to exist, even in zero-sum settings. Additionally, computing approximate LNE in smooth multiplayer games over bounded regions is PPAD-hard. These challenges, coupled with the inherent complexity, have driven recent research toward broader equilibrium concepts, such as min-max critical points, and first-order Nash equilibria (FONE), which correspond to solutions of specific non-monotone variational inequalities. This paper addresses general-sum multiplayer games with compact convex strategy sets and smooth, nonconcave utility functions. Daskalakis et al. introduced the STON'R algorithm for solving variational inequality problems and established convergence under smoothness assumptions. They further showed that the algorithm's limit points correspond to equilibria in specific classes of games, namely local minimax equilibria in two-player zero-sum games and Nash equilibria in smooth concave games. In this work, we extend the convergence result to multiplayer general-sum games and show that the variational inequality solutions targeted by STON'R correspond to first-order Nash equilibria (FONE), a general game-theoretic solution concept that unifies these previously studied cases. We demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the algorithm on various examples from recent literature.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marika Kosohorská, Tomáš Kroupa, Tomáš Votroubek. 2026-06-08. STON'R Converges to First-Order Nash~Equilibria of Multiplayer Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09565

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT