Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.12752

Beyond Resilience -- A Conceptual Framework for Civic Ascent

Alexandros Washburn·Carlo Lipizzi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The resilience literature measures urban performance as recovery: the degree to which a city returns to its pre-shock baseline. This paper develops a stronger concept -- civic ascent -- as part of a broader research program on the ethology of coupled agent-environment systems, of which the city is the deepest available empirical instance. Civic ascent is defined as the condition in which a city emerges from shock with higher functional capacity than before. We develop a conceptual framework in the ethological tradition, treating the city as a coupled system of three slow state variables -- topos (physical structure), nomos (institutional structure), and hexis (civic judgment) -- together with a fast affective channel (delta) through which shocks to topos and nomos reach hexis. The framework distinguishes three structurally distinct pressures on civic systems: shocks (discontinuities in T or M), decay (continuous entropy), and leakage (active extraction of civic surplus into non-civic pools). The ascent condition is that reinforcement from cross-coupling of T, M, and H exceeds the combined loss from decay and leakage. Post-shock ascent is measured by a normalised improvement index A(T) applied to a composite civic performance signal P(t) constructed from scale-adjusted key performance indicators, distinguishing intrinsic civic ascent from demographically driven growth. New York City after September 11, 2001, is proposed as the primary empirical case; the operational measurement program is specified in the companion NYC Civic Data Map (Washburn 2026c, 133 KPIs) and executed in Paper 2. The reader for whom only the urban contribution is of interest will find it complete in itself; the reader interested in the larger program will find this paper its formal core.

Explore related subjects

cs.CYcs.SYeess.SYphysics.soc-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexandros Washburn, Carlo Lipizzi. 2026-06-10. Beyond Resilience -- A Conceptual Framework for Civic Ascent. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12752

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Work, Wellbeing, and Choice: Empirical Lessons for AI Futures

Advances in AI-driven automation have raised questions about how humans might find wellbeing in a world where paid employment is less necessary or less available than before. Paid work has been variously characterized as both a contributor and an impediment to human wellbeing. What is already known about the relationship between paid work and wellbeing? What factors influence wellbeing among people who do not work---or who do not need to work? And how might these factors bear upon prospective AI-induced economic transformations? To help provide empirical grounding for these questions, we survey the psychological, sociological, and economic literature that investigates the relationship between wellbeing and work. We draw on evidence from multiple populations, including the unemployed, retirees, lottery winners, and financially dependent spouses. This comparative review draws from studies across OECD countries, China, India, and Gulf states. We identify three key factors that mediate the relationship between work status and wellbeing: (1) agency and choice---whether the exit from work is voluntary or involuntary, as well as long-term agency; (2) the availability of alternative sources of work's latent benefits---such as volunteering, hobbies, or state-provisioned employment; and (3) social and systemic context---including cultural norms around work and the robustness of social safety nets. We draw on these three factors to derive specific implications for different AI automation scenarios, connecting the empirical evidence to concrete policy considerations.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

From Digital Accountability to Accountable Digitality Through Needs-Aware Information Systems: The Case of Auditable Child-Welfare Judgments

Digital accountability research asks how digital systems can, among other aims, be made transparent, explainable, auditable, contestable, and supportive of ongoing learning and improvement. This paper reverses the question: how can digital transformation make established human institutions more accountable? It theorizes this reversal as accountable digitality and specifies needs-aware information systems as the mediating mechanism. The hard and paradigmatic case is child-welfare judgment, where best-interest procedures must protect children, preserve confidentiality, and respect judicial independence while enabling aggregate learning about needs, reasons, exceptions, and disparities. The case is used diagnostically and illustratively to derive and examine the design logic, not as empirical evidence or validation. Conceptual design-oriented analysis decomposes and recombines digital and legal accountability under child-rights constraints, deriving a canonical theory-to-design chain, contingent mechanisms, implications, and safeguards. It advances IS responsibility and ethics research by showing how privacy-preserving, co-created, needs-aware information systems can support institutional self-knowledge and auditable justice.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

(Whose defaults?) Is artificial intelligence reorienting archaeological methods?

Generative AI and the practice of "vibe coding" are changing how archaeologists carry out computational research, but their effects on the discipline's range of methods is still understudied. In this paper, we evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) are narrowing the variety of methods archaeologists use. We first analysed approximately 119,000 archaeology abstracts from Scopus, covering publications from 2010 to 2025. Using a locally run LLM, we identified the computational methods reported in each abstract and organised them into 25 broad categories (L2) and 241 finer clusters (L3). A Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial model of method composition within sub-disciplines found a small but credible shift in method use after 2023. However, this shift was smaller than the variation already present across the full study period. No individual technique showed a significant change, and overall methodological diversity increased rather than declined. We then ran a controlled experiment to see whether LLMs recommend a narrower set of methods than archaeologists have used in practice. Two different open-weight models were asked to suggest methods for 28 archaeological research problems, with prompts providing three levels of methodological guidance: novice, intermediate, and expert. Recommendation diversity was much lower than in the published literature, particularly without methodological guidance. The models also tended to favour methods that were widely used before 2023, and their recommendations more closely resembled the post-2023 literature. Taken together, these results are consistent with LLMs pushing methodological choice towards convergence, although our study cannot establish a causal effect. They raise a broader question: how can archaeology retain methodological diversity as LLMs become more involved in research?

cs.CY↗