SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.19079

Semantic Adapter Routing with Fine-Tuning Task Embeddings

Abstract

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has led to model ecosystems in which a single backbone is paired with many task-specialized adapters. Given such a library, routing aims to select the most appropriate adapter for a user query. While existing adapter routers typically require access to adapter weights or supervised training, we develop training-free semantic adapter routing methods using task embeddings. In ARIADNE, we reframe adapter selection as a classification problem, where PEFT adapters are represented by task embeddings and an unlabeled query is routed to the nearest adapter in the encoder's latent space. Evaluated on 23 tasks, ARIADNE recovers 97.4% of Oracle task performance and scales to 44 adapters at 89.7% selection accuracy, without touching a single adapter parameter. However, training data needed for ARIADNE may not be available when adapters come from public hubs or third-party providers. To overcome this limitation, we introduce GRACE, which recovers an adapter's fine-tuning data from its output logits alone via a modified contrastive decoding diffing (CDD) procedure. Synthetic data generated from CDD-UM is then used to construct task embeddings. Across three backbones (Llama-3.2-1B, Qwen2.5-3B, Qwen2.5-32B), GRACE recovers 72--100\% of Oracle task accuracy and matches or exceeds ARROW on 48 of 69 task/backbone combinations, while requiring neither training data nor model weights. Overall, we demonstrate that fine-tuning task embeddings provide an accurate and efficient path to semantic adapter routing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Enrico Cassano, Michał Brzozowski, Paolo Mandica, Zuzanna Dubanowska, Neo Christopher Chung. 2026-06-17. Semantic Adapter Routing with Fine-Tuning Task Embeddings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19079

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI