SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.20977

The Mathematics of Modeling the Future

Abstract

Modeling the future requires specifying conditional laws relative to an evolving information flow and describing their movement across time. This paper provides a unified mathematical synthesis of this problem along a single spine. Filtrations encode known data; conditional expectation and regular conditional probabilities yield point and distributional forecasts; Markov kernels and semigroups propagate observables and laws; and infinitesimal generators encode local dynamics, producing Kolmogorov equations and stochastic differential equations. Along this spine, martingales isolate surprise, filtering handles partial observation, finance prices futures, stochastic control optimizes choices, and ergodic theory describes the far future. The contribution is architectural. We explicitly connect derivations that turn classical objects into a unified forecasting calculus: the tower property becomes the semigroup law; Ito's formula yields the backward equation after conditioning; integration by parts provides the forward operator; and generator perturbations become model-risk distortions. Forecasting is shown not as mere data extrapolation, but the construction of dynamically coherent conditional distributions constrained by information, geometry, and admissible models. These concepts are illustrated via Gaussian Ornstein--Uhlenbeck and non-Gaussian Cox--Ingersoll--Ross processes, demonstrating how abstract machinery produces explicit transition laws, spectral decompositions, term-structure formulae, and asymptotics in diverse geometries. We recast density evolution as a Wasserstein gradient flow, place forecasting within Hilbert, Fisher--Rao, and Wasserstein geometries, provide a discrete-time empirical dictionary, and address model-risk. The result is a compact mathematical map from information to prediction, local dynamics to global laws, and idealized models to empirical forecasting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Miquel Noguer i Alonso. 2026-06-18. The Mathematics of Modeling the Future. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20977

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Variance-Optimal Hedging in the Rough Hawkes--Heston Model

We study variance-optimal stock hedging and the convergence of approximate strategies in the rough Hawkes--Heston model. Starting from the model's affine conditional transform and the affine Volterra jump framework, we obtain semi-explicit hedges for European calls and a representation of the minimum quadratic error through the Galtchouk--Kunita--Watanabe projection. Our main approximation result keeps the original stock, variance driver, and information flow fixed while regularizing the kernel used to evaluate the hedge. To handle singular memory and common marked jumps, we construct the approximate holdings from histories available before trading and preserve the conditional transform's random modulus envelope. Riccati--Volterra stability and weighted truncation then yield convergence in the original stock's trading norm on compact Fourier intervals. For calls, a joint choice of kernel regularization and Fourier cutoff gives convergence of the initial capitals and strategies, uniform-in-time square-mean convergence of continuous-time gains, and convergence of the terminal mean-square error to the variance-optimal value. A numerical experiment with shifted fractional kernels illustrates the construction on common original-market paths.

q-fin.MF

Numeraire Invariance of Entropy-Projected Martingale Measures

Let \(P\) be a fixed physical law and let \(Q\) be an equivalent martingale measure selected from the martingale-measure set associated with a chosen numeraire. A change of numeraire maps \(Q\) to \(T_LQ\), where \(d(T_LQ)=L\,dQ\) and \(L\) is the terminal likelihood ratio. The forward relative-entropy projection minimizing \(D_{\mathrm{KL}}(P\Vert Q)\) commutes with this transform because its objective changes only by the constant \(-E_P\log L\). The minimal entropy martingale measure (MEMM) orientation \(D_{\mathrm{KL}}(Q\Vert P)\) does not have this property, and a trinomial counterexample shows that independently recomputed MEMMs need not be likelihood compatible. We make two economic consequences explicit. First, the two entropy orientations are precisely the \(Q\)-dependent terms in the classical convex-dual objectives for logarithmic and exponential utility, respectively. Second, likelihood compatibility is equivalent to equality of the pricing functionals obtained in the two numeraires. Hence the forward selectors value every integrable claim consistently across numeraires, whereas the two MEMMs in the counterexample assign different prices to a nonreplicable digital claim. We also prove a finite-state class-level characterization: uniform invariance over the elementary one-period likelihood-ratio families forces a smooth convex \(f\)-divergence to be logarithmic, up to scaling and affine equivalence. Finally, in finite-state markets, the forward projection exists under the usual strictly positive feasible-point condition; its density \(dP/dQ^*\) is attainable log-optimal terminal wealth, and the minimum forward entropy equals maximal expected log growth.

q-fin.MF

The Delta of a Variance Swap

We define the variance swap delta as the sensitivity of the price of variance to a change in underlying price. We use Carr-Madan spanning formulas to analyze this sensitivity when the implied volatility smile curve may depend on the underlying price. We show that the variance swap total delta is zero for the class of smile curves that are pure functions of (log) moneyness, which goes against the empirical observation that variance is up when the market is down. We propose a simple modification of the smile to correct this issue.

q-fin.MF