SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.21527

LOGOS: LiDAR-Only Gaussian Elevation Splatting for Unified Tiny Obstacle Segmentation

Abstract

Robust obstacle segmentation is essential for the safety of intelligent robots, where LiDAR-based perception systems play a fundamental role in the robot-environment interaction. While extensive LiDAR-based approaches have demonstrated high performance on common obstacles in urban scenarios, their results on tiny obstacles such as curbs, gravel, and potholes remain unsatisfactory due to the significant similarity between tiny obstacles and inherent road undulations. Moreover, their segmentation accuracy even deteriorates sharply when the LiDAR scans suffer from degradation in challenging off-road scenes. To overcome these bottlenecks, we propose LOGOS, a LiDAR-only unified tiny obstacle segmentation system, which models the road surface as a continuous mixture of 2D Gaussian primitives and distinguishes tiny obstacles via high-presicion elevation estimation. Unlike existing Gaussian splatting methods that rely on iterative RGB training, LOGOS is a backpropagation-free LiDAR-only approach. It directly estimates Gaussian parameters via a freespace-aware initialization by incrementally pruning non-road primitives using smoothness constraints. Subsequently, pointwise signed distances are computed via a novel normal-aware elevation splatting function, ensuring robustness to both flat and sloped terrains. We evaluate LOGOS on a highly heterogeneous benchmark of point cloud frames collected from urban mobility scenarios and mining haulage off-road environments. These data are practically acquired using different LiDAR sensors and exhibit large variations in point density, terrain roughness, and obstacle types. Experiments on the road and off-road scenes demonstrate that LOGOS significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art methods, particularly in degraded point cloud regions and challenging off-road scenarios, while maintaining real-time efficiency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nan Ming, Yeqiang Qian, Chunxiang Wang, Ming Yang. 2026-06-19. LOGOS: LiDAR-Only Gaussian Elevation Splatting for Unified Tiny Obstacle Segmentation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO