Professional networks and the diffusion of clinical guidelines in opioid prescribing

Abstract

Large and persistent differences in opioid prescribing across physicians and regions cannot be explained by patient characteristics or physician attributes alone. We developed a behavioral framework in which prescribing evolves through persistence, exposure to peers in professional networks, and heterogeneous responses to a common policy signal that varies with network centrality. Using nationwide Medicare Part D data from 2013 to 2020, covering more than two million physician-year observations, we tested three hypotheses implied by this framework. Physicians exposed to higher peer prescribing subsequently prescribe more; more central physicians reduce prescribing more following the introduction of the 2016 CDC guideline, with no evidence of differential pre-trends; and changes in peer prescribing are closely associated with changes in individual prescribing in the post-guideline period. By 2020, physicians at the 90th percentile of network centrality exhibited prescribing reductions 0.30 percentage points larger than those at the 10th percentile, with the gap widening steadily after the introduction of the CDC guideline. Together, these results indicate that opioid prescribing operates through professional networks, in which policy effects spread through connections and appear to be shaped by network position. This suggests that engaging highly connected physicians may help extend the reach of opioid stewardship programs. It also raises questions about how the burden and benefits of such targeting would be distributed across physicians and patients.