Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.22684

Modular Rank and Linear-Complexity Tests for Pseudorandom Number Generators

Sebastiano Vigna
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Standard batteries of tests for pseudorandom number generators (such as dieharder, the NIST suite, and TestU01) provide two empirical tests for linearity, the binary rank and linear-complexity tests. Both operate over the field $\mathbf F_2$, and thus detect generators that are linear over $\mathbf F_2$. However, generators can be linear over a larger field, as in the case of congruential generators, single-modulus multiple-recursive recurrences, and of matrix generators such as MIXMAX. We introduce a modular version of the rank and linear-complexity tests, and provide modlin, a Rust program that implements it efficiently for fields of prime size. modlin can detect in minutes statistical bias in all current CERN's ROOT's implementations of the MIXMAX generator, for which no standard statistical test failure has been reported before.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sebastiano Vigna. 2026-06-21. Modular Rank and Linear-Complexity Tests for Pseudorandom Number Generators. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22684

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗