Evaluation of medium range machine learning models for sub-seasonal prediction

Abstract

The performance of two machine learning (ML) atmosphere models - GraphCast and FourCastNetV2 - is evaluated in the context of sub-seasonal prediction, including their ability to represent key climate drivers of variability, namely the Madden-Julian Oscillation and the Southern Annular Mode. Model skill is assessed over both a 38-year hindcast period and a 2.5-year hindcast period. The longer period overlaps with the training windows of the ML models but provides a larger sample for robust evaluation, while the shorter period is independent of the ML model training period. This dual evaluation illustrates a compromise approach to the problem of insufficient independent data for evaluation of the models for sub-seasonal prediction. The ML models are compared against the Bureau of Meteorology's physics-based seasonal prediction system, ACCESS-S2, for the 38-year period, and a more recent physics-based coupled model for the shorter hindcast period. Across the two evaluation periods, both ML models have surprisingly good skill for sub-seasonal timescales, given they were designed for forecasting on medium range timescales. In general, the ML models are as skilful as the physical model ensemble mean at shorter lead times and comparable to the physical model ensemble members at longer lead times.