SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.26134

Motive Theory Hidden in Karaji-Pascal Triangle

Abstract

These lecture notes are intended as an accessible introduction to some basic ideas of motive theory for readers with limited background in algebraic geometry. Mathematics often reveals unexpected connections between seemingly distant areas. A simple combinatorial identity may encode geometric structures, arithmetic information, or even sophisticated categorical phenomena. In these notes, we trace a path from elementary counting arguments to Voevodsky's theory of motives. We show how some classical combinatorial identities emerge naturally from geometry, and how motivic decompositions reveal the deeper geometric and arithmetic structures underlying them. Our guiding example is provided by the Karaji--Pascal identity and its $q$-analogue, which link combinatorics and algebraic geometry. Thus our primary aim of these lecture notes is to demonstrate that some familiar combinatorial identities can provide non-experts with an entry point to some of the basic ideas of motive theory! Moreover, while introducing the reader to the subject, we also hope to encourage the view that even an elementary mathematical formula may encode a deeper underlying geometric and arithmetic structure. Along the way, the notes offer a gentle introduction to motives through a concrete example rather than through the full technical machinery of modern theory.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Somayeh Habibi. 2026-06-18. Motive Theory Hidden in Karaji-Pascal Triangle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26134

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO