SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2606.27151

Scott complexity of trees of finite rank via degrees of categoricity

Abstract

In earlier work \cite{Mah19}, the first author constructed, for each finite $m\geq 1$, a computable tree $\A_{m+1}$ of rank $m+1$ whose strong degree of categoricity is $\mathbf{0}^{(2m)}$, and showed this degree is optimal at each rank. Those results are lightface: they concern Turing degrees of isomorphisms between computable copies. In this paper we determine the boldface content of the construction. We isolate a transfer principle: a degree-of-categoricity lower bound that holds uniformly relative to every oracle defeats $L_{\omega_1\omega}$-definability of automorphism orbits outright. We verify that the construction of \cite{Mah19} has this uniformity, and deduce that $\A_{m+1}$ has Scott rank exactly $2m+1$, with Scott sentence complexity one of $\Sin{2m+1}$, $\dSin{2m+1}$, or $\Pin{2m+2}$. For rank $2$ we carry out a complete, computability-free Scott analysis: the orbit of the level-one nodes of infinite degree is $\Pin{2}$- but not $\Sin{2}$-definable, and $\SSC(\A_2)=\Pin{4}$ exactly, witnessed by a computable $\Pc{4}$ Scott sentence. We then prove $\SSC(\A_{m+1})=\Pin{2m+2}$ for all finite $m$: among the three candidates, only $\Pin{2m+2}$ is consistent with the parameterized Scott rank, and a parameter-reservation argument -- naming any finite tuple reserves only finitely many top-level subtrees, and the relativized coding survives on the infinitely many spare subtrees -- pins $\pSR(\A_{m+1})=2m+1$, selecting that candidate. These results begin a classification of the Scott sentence complexities of trees of finite rank, in analogy with the Gonzalez--Rossegger analysis of linear orders, and connect the $2\alpha$-jump phenomenon in degrees of categoricity to Scott spectral-gap questions for trees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mohammad Mahmoud, Mostafa Mirabi. 2026-06-25. Scott complexity of trees of finite rank via degrees of categoricity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27151

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO