Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.27847

Robust Shattering Arguments

Mohsen Ghaffari·Magnús M. Halldórsson·Yannic Maus·Alexandre Nolin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Graph shattering is a central technique underlying sublogarithmic-time distributed algorithms in the LOCAL model. Its analysis typically relies on bounding the probability that large sets of distant nodes remain unresolved, often via independence assumptions justified by locality. We show that these assumptions fail for pre-shattering procedures that run for super-constant rounds, where dependencies accumulate over time. As a result, several standard shattering arguments in the literature are incomplete, including those for maximal independent set, $(\Delta+1)$-coloring, and the distributed Lov\'asz Local Lemma (LLL). We provide a systematic repair of these analyses. Our main contribution is a corrected shattering analysis of the Fischer--Ghaffari LLL algorithm. In addition, we develop general tools that capture common patterns in modern algorithms and yield the required decay bounds without relying on independence. We also present explicit counterexamples to commonly used shattering lemmas. Overall, we establish a robust and reusable foundation for shattering arguments in the presence of long-range dependencies.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mohsen Ghaffari, Magnús M. Halldórsson, Yannic Maus, Alexandre Nolin. 2026-06-26. Robust Shattering Arguments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27847

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗