Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.31497

Communication-Aware Robot Execution for Cloud Inference under Spatially Heterogeneous Connectivity

Fengkai Liu·Yuichi Ohsita·Masayuki Murata·Hideyuki Shimonishi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Cloud-hosted foundation models enable robots to use semantic reasoning beyond onboard computational limits. In this setting, the robot executes a currently available primitive generated by the cloud, and continued task progress requires the next cloud result before this primitive is exhausted. This execution becomes fragile under spatially heterogeneous connectivity, because the current primitive determines when the next result is needed, whereas the wireless environment determines where the next request can be submitted and where the response can be retrieved. Strategies that reduce latency or improve individual transmissions can shorten this dependency, but they do not determine a submission location that supports reliable upload and leaves a feasible opportunity for response retrieval. To address this problem, we introduce the request--response window, which characterizes the time required for the next cloud cycle, including uplink transmission, cloud inference, downlink retrieval, and inference uncertainty. Building on this window and an available communication map, the proposed framework treats the next request point as a motion decision during ongoing primitive execution, selecting it to provide sufficient communication quality for cloud request submission while preserving progress within the finite support of the current primitive. The selected request point is incorporated into a local planner, which guides the robot toward the request point before submission and then continues task execution while maintaining sufficient connectivity for retrieving the next cloud result. Experiments in an indoor wireless scenario built from measurements show that the proposed method achieves the best or tied-best task success among the compared methods, while using fewer request attempts and producing lower request failure rates.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fengkai Liu, Yuichi Ohsita, Masayuki Murata, Hideyuki Shimonishi. 2026-06-30. Communication-Aware Robot Execution for Cloud Inference under Spatially Heterogeneous Connectivity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31497

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗