Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.01377

Liquidity Premium and Investment Horizons

Irene Aldridge
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We estimate Kyle's (1985) price-impact coefficient $\lambda$ directly from daily equity order flow and test its ability to forecast the cross-section of subsequent stock returns. Using CRSP data from 2020 to 2025, we construct firm-month measures of signed order flow and two estimators of $\hat\lambda_{it}$: a within-month price-impact regression and an Amihud-style ratio. Signed order flow strongly predicts contemporaneous and one-month-ahead returns, while volume volatility predicts lower subsequent returns, consistent with widening price impact degrading price discovery. Fama-MacBeth regressions confirm that our order-flow signal carries significant cross-sectional return information after Newey--West adjustment. Theoretically, we resolve the liquidity premium puzzle of Constantinides (1986) through an adverse-selection mechanism: low order flow widens $\lambda$ and depresses prices today; subsequent normalization restores prices, generating the illiquidity premium without risk-based compensation.

Explore related subjects

econ.EMq-fin.PRq-fin.STq-fin.TR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Irene Aldridge. 2026-07-01. Liquidity Premium and Investment Horizons. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01377

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM↗