SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.03281

Optimality-Preserving Data Reduction for Maximum k-Cut (Full Version)

Abstract

Preprocessing has become an increasingly important part of solving Maximum Cut to optimality, enabling exact solvers to tackle significantly larger instances. This suggests that exact solvers for the more general Maximum k-Cut problem could also benefit from sophisticated preprocessing. However, to the best of our knowledge, no preprocessing techniques that are effective for k > 2 have been published. In this paper, we introduce structured cut sets, a novel data reduction technique for Maximum k-Cut. We provide criteria under which deleting cut sets is optimality-preserving, yielding a decomposition into connected components that can be solved independently and whose solutions can be combined into an optimal solution for the original graph. Furthermore, we extend several preprocessing techniques from Maximum Cut to Maximum k-Cut. To show that our rules are optimality-preserving, we develop a new proof framework based on the addition of weighted graphs. We complement our theoretical results by engineering a preprocessing framework for Maximum k-Cut and show its effectiveness in a computational study. The preprocessed instances are typically significantly smaller. Integrating our preprocessing into an exact solver yields significant speed-ups and enables solving more instances to optimality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Kaibel, Petra Mutzel. 2026-07-03. Optimality-Preserving Data Reduction for Maximum k-Cut (Full Version). https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03281

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS