Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.06218

Chains and Antichains inside Many-One Degrees and Variants

Linus Richter·Frank Stephan·Xiaoyan Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The relations between many-one degrees and one-one degrees have been studied since the beginning of recursion theory; early results from the 1960s include that many-one degrees always have a largest one-one degree and either that one-one degree is the only one-one degree inside the many-one degree or every countable linear order is noneffectively embeddable into the structure of one-one degrees inside the given many-one degree. Furthermore, the greatest recursive many-one degree is a special case, as it allows to embed ascending infinite chains but not descending infinite chains, all other many-one degrees fall into the two cases mentioned above. It remained open whether infinite antichains can always be embedded when the many-one degree is nonrecursive and nonirreducible; Odifreddi stated in a survey 1981 and in his book Classical Recursion Theory in the year 1989 this question explicitly as an open problem. D\"egtev had already in 1976 constructed antichains of one-one degrees inside all nonrecursive and nonirreducible recursively enumerable many-one degrees and Batyrshin generalised the result to all nonrecursive and nonirreducible limit-recursive many-one degrees. In 2026, Cintioli showed that there is a measure $1$ class of sets whose many-one degrees contain infinite antichains of one-one degrees. This class contains all rigid many-one degrees. The present work generalises Batyrshin's result to all nonrecursive and nonirreducible many-one degrees and solves therefore Odifreddi's open problem. The present work also proposes to deepen the study of reducibilities between one-one and many-one in recursion theory in order to get a more complete and detailed picture for the structures inside many-one degrees. In particular it studies finite-one and bounded finite-one reducibilities where the first was introduced by Maslova in the 1970ies.

Explore related subjects

math.LOcs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Linus Richter, Frank Stephan, Xiaoyan Zhang. 2026-07-07. Chains and Antichains inside Many-One Degrees and Variants. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06218

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗