SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.07257

Non-Minimal $k$-Perfect Hashing: Tight Lower Bounds and an Application to Fast Static Hash Tables

Abstract

A minimal perfect hash function (minimal PHF) is a data structure mapping a static set of $n$ keys to $n$ bins without collisions. Two natural generalizations are minimal $k$-PHFs where $n$ keys are mapped to $n/k$ bins of capacity $k$ each, and (non-minimal) PHFs with load factor ${\alpha} < 1$ where the number of bins is increased by a factor of $1/{\alpha}$, resulting in spare capacity. While there has been a recent surge of interest in perfect hashing generally, non-minimal $k$-PHFs have not been systematically studied despite a natural use case of speeding up static hash tables: The idea is that a small cache-resident $k$-PHF maps each key $x$ to a cache-line-sized bin of capacity $k$ where $x$ resides. Ideally, this yields a branchless lookup operation with a single cache miss working at high load factors for positive and negative queries alike. Our main theoretical contribution is to determine tight space lower bounds for $k$-PHFs for all pairs of ${\alpha} \in (0,1]$ and $k \geq 1$. It turns out that combining ${\alpha} < 1$ and $k \geq 2$ drastically reduces the space of $k$-PHFs, e.g. for $(k,{\alpha}) = (16,0.8)$ the space lower bound is $0.027$ bits per key while for $(k,{\alpha}) = (16,1.0)$ and $(k,{\alpha}) = (1,0.8)$ the lower bounds are higher by factors of $\approx 8$ and $\approx 32$, respectively. On the practical side, we develop a $k$-PHF based on PtrHash and tune it for use in static hash tables. Empirically, our implementation produces $k$-PHFs of size roughly $50\%$ above the lower bound. A static hash set based on this $k$-PHF is consistently at least as fast as other hash sets for negative and mixed queries. On two of the three tested architectures it achieves up to $1.5\times$ speedup for large $n\geq 30M$ where a $1$-PHF does not fit in cache.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ragnar Groot Koerkamp, Stefan Hermann, Peter Sanders, Stefan Walzer. 2026-07-08. Non-Minimal $k$-Perfect Hashing: Tight Lower Bounds and an Application to Fast Static Hash Tables. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.esa.2026.20

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS