SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.09069

Reducing stable forking dependence to finitely many pregeometries

Abstract

We show that one of the main cases of the stable forking conjecture, stability of the forking relation over a base in a finite-rank supersimple theory, is determined by finitely many pregeometries in each rank. This case of the stable forking conjecture has long had an implicitly well-known pregeometric interpretation: there is a set of matroids $\mathcal{G}_{n}$ such that the forking instability in rank $n$ is equivalent to the pregeometry on some rank-one partial type (over a finite set) embedding a matroid in $\mathcal{G}_{n}$. Our contribution is to show that this set of matroids $\mathcal{G}_{n}$, determining based forking stability in rank $n$, can be chosen to be finite. The main part of our proof was already accomplished in rank $3$ by Peretz, but does not extend as stated to higher ranks (and may or may not directly extend in a weaker sense to higher ranks, by shrinking terms). However, we obtain a sufficient substitute for Peretz's work in ranks $n > 3$: we turn Peretz's original universal result into an existence theorem. The rest of our proof refines an argument from multi-experiment parameter definability, originating from work in applied model theory by Li, Meshkat, Ovchinnikov, Pillay, Pogudin and Scanlon.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Scott Mutchnik. 2026-07-10. Reducing stable forking dependence to finitely many pregeometries. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO