SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.09268

Matroid Contention Resolution with Concentration

Abstract

Contention resolution schemes (CRS) are a fundamental and widely applied tool for rounding fractional solutions subject to combinatorial constraints. However, the known analyses of CRS generally only guarantee lower bounds on the expected value and concentration on the upper tail, but no concentration on the lower tail. Thus, CRS are generally not applicable to problems that contain covering constraints, since certifying a covering constraint holds requires a lower tail bound. Our main contribution is to derive lower tail bounds for the output of a particular contention resolution scheme, the random-order CRS of Adamczyk and W{\l}odarczyk, which we call AW. We show that every linear function of the rounded solution attains a constant fraction of its expectation with a failure probability that is dimension-free, depending only on the expected value and on the number of matroids, but not on the size of the ground set. Our analysis is driven by a new property we call \emph{strong $\lambda$-boundedness}, which strengthens the known $\lambda$-boundedness of AW by providing two-sided control on how rounding propagates between elements. We then introduce a random process capturing AW, a \emph{sequential selection process}, that may be of independent interest. We prove lower tail bounds for any strongly $\lambda$-bounded sequential selection process. To demonstrate the applicability of our new tail bounds, we apply them to two problems involving covering constraints. The first result is an $O(k \log k)$-approximation for $k$-matroid intersection coloring (improving the prior $O(k^2)$) when the chromatic number of at least one matroid is $\Omega(k^3 \log n)$, where $n$ is the number of elements. The second is the first bicriteria approximation algorithm for monotone submodular maximization under $k$ matroid constraints together with packing and covering constraints.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stephen Arndt, Benjamin Moseley, Kirk Pruhs, Michael Zlatin. 2026-07-10. Matroid Contention Resolution with Concentration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09268

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS