SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.10075

Distributed Load Balancing on Unrelated Machines

Abstract

We study the well-known load balancing problem in the distributed CONGEST model of computation. We consider the unrelated machines setting, where each job $j$ specifies a size $s_{ij}$ for every machine $i$. We want to find an assignment $\varphi: J \to M$ minimizing the maximum machine load, where the load of a machine $i$ is the total size of the jobs assigned to it. In the CONGEST model, the state-of-the-art is an algorithm that runs in polylog rounds and returns a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate fractional solution from Ahmadian, Liu, Peng, and Zadimoghaddam (2021). However, this algorithm, as well as all previous CONGEST algorithms only solve a special case of load balancing, where each job has the same size on each machine. Our main contribution is an algorithm for general sizes $s_{ij}$. The algorithm computes a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate fractional solution or a $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximate integral solution in polylog rounds. The problem structure changes significantly once we allow arbitrary edge-sizes, so our techniques are very different from those used in previous algorithms for distributed load balancing. One ingredient of our result is a black-box tool of independent interest: a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm to arbitrary mixed packing-covering linear programs in the CONGEST model in polylog rounds. such algorithms were known in the more powerful parallel model, but previous polylog-round algorithms in the distributed CONGEST model only solved pure packing or pure covering problems. We improve upon a recent $O(D\,\mathrm{polylog})$-round CONGEST algorithm for mixed packing-covering, where $D$ is the diameter of the communication graph.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aaron Bernstein, Anupam Gupta, Zhaozi Wang. 2026-07-11. Distributed Load Balancing on Unrelated Machines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10075

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS