SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.10222

Scalable Bayesian structure learning of directed acyclic graphs via Laplace approximation, with an application to breast cancer gene expression networks

Abstract

Structure learning of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) from observational data is a foundational task in causal discovery and is widely used to infer regulatory networks from medical and genomic measurements. The Bayesian formulation quantifies model uncertainty and admits prior biological knowledge, but its practical use has been hampered by the super-exponential growth of the DAG space and by the intractability of the node-marginal likelihood under flexible, non-conjugate priors. Existing closed-form solutions are largely confined to the conjugate Normal--Inverse-Gamma prior. We develop a Laplace-approximated Bayesian scoring function for the non-conjugate Normal--Gamma prior on the modified Cholesky parameterisation of the precision matrix, embed it in a Metropolis--Hastings sampler over DAGs, and couple the latent Gaussian network to a binary clinical outcome through a probit link. We show that the node-marginal integral is of generalised inverse-Gaussian form, so that its exact value is a modified Bessel function of the second kind and the proposed scoring function is its leading large-argument asymptotic; the posterior of each conditional variance is likewise generalised inverse-Gaussian and is sampled exactly. In simulation, the proposed prior improves on the conjugate baseline and on the PC, greedy-equivalence-search, NOTEARS, and DAGMA benchmarks at sample sizes typical of clinical cohorts. On two real datasets, the Sachs protein-signalling network, scored against its validated consensus graph, and the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer data, the method recovers known structure and, through the DAG-probit extension, predicts malignancy from nuclear morphometry with a cross-validated ROC-AUC of $0.94$ using a sparse, interpretable set of direct predictors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Samaneh Nazari, Mohammad Arashi, Abdolnasser Sadeghkhani. 2026-07-11. Scalable Bayesian structure learning of directed acyclic graphs via Laplace approximation, with an application to breast cancer gene expression networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10222

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME