SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.10731

On the upper bound of the generalization of $\mathsf{FFD}$ to solve $q$BP for some special cases

Abstract

We consider a variant of the bin packing problem with constraints on the number of copies of each item and their placement in the packing. The input $D_q := DD\ldots$ is defined as $q$ consecutive copies of the multiset $D$, with a fixed bin capacity $S$. Note that, for each item in $D$, there are $q$ copies in $D_q$. The goal is to pack all the items in $D_q$ into the minimum number of bins, such that each bin contains at most one copy of each item and the total size of all items in a bin does not exceed the bin capacity $S$. We call this problem $q$BP. First Fit Decreasing ($\mathsf{FFD}$) is a classical bin packing algorithm: it first orders the items in nonincreasing order, then packs the next item into the first bin where it fits. In the literature, $\mathsf{FFD}$ proofs rely on the assumption that the last bin in the $\mathsf{FFD}$ packing contains only a single item. This assumption does not naturally extend to the $q$BP problem. In this paper, we circumvent this difficulty by analyzing $\mathsf{FFDq(D_q)}$ on a carefully chosen subinstance ${D'}_q \subseteq D_q$ ($q$ consecutive copies of $D$, each copy sorted in non-increasing order) while preserving the same upper bound for the original input $D_q$. We show that the approximation ratio of $\mathsf{FFDq(D_q)}$ for some special cases is \begin{align*} \mathsf{FFDq(D_q)} \leq \frac{11}{9}\mathsf{OPT(D_q)} + 3q \end{align*} where $\mathsf{FFDq}$ and $\mathsf{OPT}$ denote the number of bins used by the $\mathsf{FFD}$ generalization and by an optimal algorithm, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dinesh Kumar Baghel. 2026-07-12. On the upper bound of the generalization of $\mathsf{FFD}$ to solve $q$BP for some special cases. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10731

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS