SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.11033

Limit laws for component-pruned sparse random graphs and percolated tori

Abstract

We prove an $\mathrm{MSO}_2$ zero-one law for a very sparse Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi graph after pruning by component order. Let $p_n=c_n/n$, where $c_n\to0$, and delete every component of order less than $f(n)$, where $f(n)\to\infty$. If \[ f(n)\bigl(\log f(n)+\log(1/c_n)\bigr)=o(\log n), \] then the resulting graph satisfies a zero-one law for $\mathrm{MSO}_2$, with quantification over sets of vertices and sets of edges. The proof combines uniform component counts, an MSO Feferman-Vaught decomposition for disjoint unions, and semilinearity of the order spectra of MSO-definable classes of finite trees. We also show that the term $f(n)\log f(n)$ cannot simply be omitted: star components can occur at first-order-visible Poisson thresholds. We further establish first-order limit laws for bond percolation on the discrete torus $T_L^d$. In the two-sided subpolynomial regime, pruning below a sufficiently slow threshold yields a zero-one law. For the unpruned model in either one-sided polynomial regime, the reciprocal exponents $\alpha=1/k$ are precisely the critical scales. At such a scale, an extended limit of $N p_N^k$ or $N q_N^k$ equal to $0$ or $\infty$ gives a zero-one law; a positive finite limit gives a convergence law but not a zero-one law; and the absence of an extended limit gives failure of convergence. Finally, $\mathrm{MSO}_1$ already detects the parity of the torus side length through bipartiteness, producing a natural obstruction to monadic convergence in a near-deterministic regime.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mostafa Mirabi, Saharon Shelah. 2026-07-13. Limit laws for component-pruned sparse random graphs and percolated tori. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11033

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO