SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.11413

Minimum Degree Spanning Tree: $(1+\epsilon,1)$-Approximation in Near-Linear Time

Abstract

The minimum degree spanning tree problem is a classic NP-hard problem whose optimal approximation guarantee was established since the early 1990s: F\"urer and Raghavachari [FR92] gave an $\tilde O(mn)$-time algorithm that computes a spanning tree with maximum degree $\Delta^\star+1$, where $\Delta^\star$ denotes the optimum value. Whether similarly strong guarantees can be achieved in near-linear time has remained open for over three decades. We give the first near-linear-time algorithm that computes a spanning tree with maximum degree $\lceil (1+\epsilon)\Delta^\star\rceil+1$ in $\tilde O(m/\epsilon^2)$ time. Prior near-linear-time algorithms either achieved the weaker bound $\lceil (1+\epsilon)\Delta^\star\rceil + O(\log n/\epsilon^2)$ [DHZ20] or required dense graphs with $m\ge n^{7/4}$ [CQT21,BFW26]. Using the same framework, our algorithm can also compute a spanning tree with maximum degree $\Delta^\star+1$ in $\tilde O(mn^{2/3})$ time, improving upon the recent $\tilde O(mn^{3/4})$-time algorithm of [BFW26]. These two results strictly improve all previous construction algorithms for the minimum degree spanning tree problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sayan Bhattacharya, Ermiya Farokhnejad, Thatchaphol Saranurak, Haoze Wang. 2026-07-13. Minimum Degree Spanning Tree: $(1+\epsilon,1)$-Approximation in Near-Linear Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11413

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS