Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.12308

Mystra: Declarative Dynamic Taint Analysis via Shadow Virtual Machine

Zhuohao Zhang·Junkun Liu·Rui Yang·Yinzhi Cao·Ziyang Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dynamic taint analysis (DTA) for interpreted languages like JavaScript and Python requires three capabilities: observing host-runtime operations, maintaining parallel taint states, and defining how taint propagates. Existing systems couple these capabilities within an instrumentation mechanism -- source-rewriting or engine-native -- either incurring high runtime overhead or demanding engine-specific embeddings. There is yet to be a runtime-independent abstraction of a general DTA that separates taint semantics and state transitions from how a host runtime executes them. We set out to develop a DTA engine that is extensible, performant, and accurate. To achieve this, we introduce a Shadow Virtual Machine executing alongside host runtimes that tracks multi-level taint, provenance, and cross-invocation context. We design Mystra, a declarative taint specification language with formal operational semantics. Mystra is designed to be language model friendly, and is equipped with validators enabling trustworthy automated synthesis of rules. Mystra is also the first to express higher-order function taint transfer declaratively. Further, Mystra rules are compiled ahead of time to a binary representation and dispatch in constant runtime. We implement our vision into a tool named Shar, which contains a shared core engine and instantiations on three runtimes: V8 in both Node$.$js and Chromium (embedding), SpiderMonkey (engine), and CPython (language). Accuracy wise, on SecBench$.$js (493 in-scope CVEs across four CWE categories), our V8 instantiation achieves 95.5% recall with zero false positives on patched-version testing. Regarding performance, the runtime overhead of Shar is 1.85$\times$ over vanilla Node$.$js on NodeMedic's benchmarks, and is 22.7$\times$ lower than NodeMedic-FINE on identical workloads, all the while producing 33.2% higher recall in its supported categories.

Explore related subjects

cs.PLcs.SE

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zhuohao Zhang, Junkun Liu, Rui Yang, Yinzhi Cao, Ziyang Li. 2026-07-14. Mystra: Declarative Dynamic Taint Analysis via Shadow Virtual Machine. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12308

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

UnsafeChecker: Finding Soundness Bugs in Rust Safe Abstractions

Rust guarantees memory safety without garbage collection through a strict ownership and borrowing system. However, for low-level systems programming, many widely used libraries rely on the unsafe keyword. These libraries encapsulate raw-pointer operations behind safe APIs to form safe abstractions. A single mistake in this internal unsafe code can break its safety contract, rendering the abstraction unsound and allowing safe clients to trigger undefined behavior. Detecting these potential soundness violations is challenging. Existing static analysis tools for C/C++ ignore Rust-specific safety contracts, while current Rust tools lack the deep semantic modeling required to track the contexts that raw pointers erase. To address this gap, we present UnsafeChecker, a compiler-integrated static analysis framework for detecting potential soundness violations in Rust safe abstractions. UnsafeChecker analyzes Rust MIR using a flow-sensitive abstract interpretation that maintains a shared state with three components: ownership, object validity, and layout. Each warning rule consumes the subset of facts needed for the corresponding Rust safety obligation. UnsafeChecker reports both instruction-level undefined behavior and boundary-level contract violations that may escape through safe APIs. We evaluate UnsafeChecker on a benchmark of 46 RustSec vulnerabilities, which contain 53 ground-truth bugs. UnsafeChecker outperforms several state-of-the-art tools, detecting 32 CVEs and covering 36 bugs (67.9% recall) with 51.6% alert-level precision. Furthermore, in a large-scale scan of real-world crates on crates.io, UnsafeChecker uncovered 114 previously unknown bugs across 83 crates, with 45 confirmed and 27 already fixed by maintainers.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

Mapping Dynamic, Hierarchical Quantum Circuits

Qubit mapping is a critical pass in quantum compilation. Despite various advances, dynamic circuits, those exhibiting data dependent control-flow, often resulting from qubit measurements, are not yet supported by the vast majority of available qubit mappers. The crucial limitation to overcome is the dependence on flat, one-dimensional representations of circuits. Further, qubit mappers currently lack compiler abstractions that capture the hierarchical nature of circuits, hindering the qubit mapping process. In this paper, 1 we introduce a new qubit mapping method and analyses to tackle hierarchical dynamic circuits. Our novelty resides in four key aspects: modeling (statically) sub-circuits in disjoint control-flow paths, introducing a novel Qubit Reconciliation pass to maintain consistency between sub-circuit and control-flow boundaries, a loop-entry remapping pass, and a refined cost function enhanced for SWAP count, circuit depth, circuit latency and error. We demonstrate the efficiency of our approach on a wide range of dynamic circuits on two monolithic Quantum Processing Units of 127 and 156 qubits, and on chiplet hexagon-based QPUs. On monolithic QPUs, our qubit mapper improves the SWAP count by up to 52%, depth by up to 18%, latency by up to 18.6%, and error by up to 40%. On chiplet architectures, we achieve improvements of up to 36% on SWAP count, 8.7% on depth, 15% on latency, and 15% of error.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

Erased Postulates, Identity Types and Quotients

This text is concerned with the question of whether, in type theory with erasure annotations, one can postulate that some type is inhabited and still have a guarantee that a program will not get stuck. Previous work has provided such guarantees for consistent erased postulates, i.e. postulates that are restricted to be used in erased contexts. Here those guarantees are extended to type theory with identity types. Similar ideas provide a simple way to support quotient types: it is shown that one can let things like "the equivalence classes for two related values are equal" be erased postulates and have an eliminator that only computes for the equivalence class constructor, and still get a guarantee that programs will compute correctly. Another question is whether programs compute correctly if one is allowed to transport (cast) using erased identity proofs. It is shown that this is safe in the absence of quotients and postulates, and in the presence of quotients and erased postulates that can be implemented using equality reflection. However, unrestricted transports of this kind are not compatible with erased, postulated univalence. For that reason the text includes a study of the function []-cong, which encapsulates a limited form of transport for erased identity proofs. The text is accompanied by machine-checked Agda proofs.

cs.PL↗