SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.12374

Quantum Space-Time Tradeoffs for TSP via Extremal Set Systems

Abstract

Recent work of Ameli, Nederlof and Wang and of Dallant and Kozma introduced a framework for improving classical space--time tradeoffs for the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and related permutation problems via extremal set systems with many maximal chains. In this note we observe that, for so called permutation problems whose outer aggregation is a minimum (such as TSP), the same framework admits a simple quantum analogue: instead of iterating over the covering family of set systems, we apply quantum minimum finding over the family. More precisely, let $P_S$ denote the optimal inverse normalized chain density among set systems of normalized size at most $S$. Then TSP admits a bounded-error quantum algorithm using $\widetilde O(S^n)$ QRAM space and \[ \widetilde O\!\left((S\sqrt{P_S})^n\right) \] time. The same argument applies to other minimization problems over permutations with a similar structure to TSP. Combining this observation with improved extremal set-system constructions of Andoni, Dallant, Kozma and Yu gives an explicit quantum space--time tradeoff curve, which beats the known quantum tradeoff by Caroppo et al. for all $1<S \leq 1.657$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Justin Dallant. 2026-07-14. Quantum Space-Time Tradeoffs for TSP via Extremal Set Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12374

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS