SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.14093

Intelligent Three Level Learning Architecture for Autonomous UAV Swarms in Search and Rescue

Abstract

This paper presents a novel three level hierarchical learning architecture for autonomous UAV swarms performing search and rescue operations. Unlike conventional approaches that apply a single learning paradigm across all hierarchy levels, the proposed architecture integrates three qualitatively different learning mechanisms corresponding to the biological hierarchy of reflexes, skills, and reasoning such as Hebbian neuroplasticity for individual agent adaptation, multi agent reinforcement learning with graph neural networks and behavior trees for tactical coordination, and model agnostic meta learning with BDI reasoning and a digital twin for strategic decision making. The architecture is formalized through twenty two architectural contracts organized across six components such as BDI, Behavior Trees, GNN, MARL, Neuroplasticity, Meta Learning that collectively provide six classes of formal guarantees such as safety, budget correctness, optimality, liveness, starvation freedom, and inter level consistency. We introduce Swarm Meta Cognition as a compositional property arising from the structured interaction of all three levels, enabling the swarm to monitor its own cognitive state and switch between cognitive strategies. Five constructive progress functions for SAR task types bridge the gap between abstract optimization theory and concrete operational scenarios. The main integration theorem establishes that when all contracts are satisfied, the hybrid neuro-symbolic system preserves all six guarantee classes. For the dynamic case with active learning, five new contracts extend the framework with three additional guarantees such as cognitive resilience, graceful degradation, and monotonic meta improvement. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that the architecture addresses five fundamental limitations of existing hierarchical RL approaches.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Oleksii Bychkov. 2026-04-09. Intelligent Three Level Learning Architecture for Autonomous UAV Swarms in Search and Rescue. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14093

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI