SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.16037

Contextual Fraction on Permutation Gain Graphs: Exact Algorithms, Query Lower Bounds, and Dynamic Maintenance

Abstract

For an explicitly represented finite empirical model, deciding whether the contextual fraction is strictly below one is NP-complete, while the standard exact linear program has one column for every global assignment. We identify a permutation-transport class in which this global problem collapses to a fixed-point calculation. Let a connected permutation gain graph act on a finite state set $O$, let $H \leq{ \rm Sym}(O)$ be its holonomy subgroup, let $F = {\rm Fix}(H)$, and let $p$ be an $H$-invariant root distribution. For the induced empirical model, \[ {\rm NCF}(e)=p(F),\qquad {\rm CF}(e)=1-p(F). \] Consequently, compatibility, $F$, and ${\rm CF}(e)$ are computable in $O(|O|(|V|+|E|))$ arithmetic and table operations. For every finite simple $2$-edge-connected graph, any deterministic exact algorithm in the explicit permutation-table query model requires at least $(|O|-1)|E|$ probes in the worst case, making the dependence on the input tables optimal up to constant factors. With a fixed spanning tree, chord insertions and deletions require $O(|O|)$ worst-case time, or time proportional to the moved-set representation, while compatibility and contextual-fraction queries take $O(1)$ time. Finally, for common-marginal realizable binary constraint languages, the support threshold ${\rm CF} < 1$ is polynomial-time equivalent to the associated finite-domain constraint-satisfaction problem and therefore inherits the Bulatov--Zhuk dichotomy. The results identify a query-optimal and dynamically maintainable tractability island inside the general contextual-fraction problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ronald Katende. 2026-07-17. Contextual Fraction on Permutation Gain Graphs: Exact Algorithms, Query Lower Bounds, and Dynamic Maintenance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS