Solving Stackelberg Vertex Cover on trees using split and join

Dominik Scheder; Johannes Tantow

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.16078

Solving Stackelberg Vertex Cover on trees using split and join

Dominik Scheder·Johannes Tantow

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Stackelberg Vertex Cover problem is a bilevel optimization problem with two players on a graph $G = (F \cup P, E)$ where each vertex from $F$ has a weight and the first player selects a price for each vertex in $P$. Afterwards, the second player finds a minimum vertex cover $X$ and the first player receives the set price for each vertex from $X \cap P$. The goal is to maximize the revenue of the first player. This problem was recently shown to be NP-complete for bipartite graphs while being solvable in linear time on paths. We present three new algorithms for solving Stackelberg Vertex Cover on certain kinds of trees: (1) a pseudo-polynomial algorithm working on general trees when all weights are integer, i.e., it is FPT with the maximum weight as a parameter; (2) a strongly polynomial algorithm for trees having the property that the least common ancestor of any two vertices from $P$ is again in $P$ (this case includes paths); and (3) an FPT-algorithm for trees, where the parameter is the maximum number $P$-vertices $v_i$ that an $F$-vertex $u$ can reach while using no other $P$-vertices. These algorithms are based on a lemma that allows us to split instances at a vertex $u$ into multiple sub-instances, which follows from LP duality and integrality of the vertex cover LP on bipartite graphs. The lemma requires that the minimum vertex covers of the sub-instances agree on $u$ (either all include $u$ or all don't). For this we introduce the concept of commitments. Finally, we show that the Stackelberg Vertex Cover problem with commitments is weakly NP-complete.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Dominik Scheder, Johannes Tantow. 2026-07-17. Solving Stackelberg Vertex Cover on trees using split and join. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16078

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗