SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.16126

A Unified Theory of Sparsification

Abstract

We study the sparsifiability of \emph{real-valued codes}, a unifying abstraction that generalizes both combinatorial and continuous notions of sparsification, including spectral sparsification. In our setting, a code $C \subseteq \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^m$ is simply a collection of nonnegative real-valued vectors, and for a parameter $\epsilon > 0$, a \emph{$(1 \pm \epsilon)$-sparsifier} of $C$ is a subset $T \subseteq [m]$, together with weights $w \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^T$, such that, for every $c \in C$, $\sum_{i \in T} w_i c_i \in (1 \pm \epsilon)\sum_{i=1}^m c_i$. When $C \subseteq \{0,1\}^m$, this specializes to code sparsification, and hence captures CSP sparsification, as studied by Khanna--Putterman--Sudan (SODA 2024, STOC 2025) and Brakensiek--Guruswami (STOC 2025). Similarly, for a graph $G=(V,E)$, if one defines $C=\{c^{(x)}:x\in\mathbb R^V\}\subseteq\mathbb R_{\geq 0}^E$ by $c^{(x)}_{(u,v)}=(x_u-x_v)^2$, then sparsifying $C$ is exactly spectral graph sparsification, as studied by Spielman--Teng (SICOMP 2011). Although the techniques driving combinatorial and continuous sparsification have traditionally been largely disjoint, our main result is a single structural theorem governing the sparsifiability of arbitrary real-valued codes $C\subseteq\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^m$. The central parameter is \emph{continuous-valued non-redundancy} ($\mathrm{CVNRD}$), a real-valued analogue of non-redundancy that captures the largest approximately block-diagonal obstruction contained in $C$. Our theorem gives sparsifiers of size nearly-linear in $\mathrm{CVNRD}$, and shows that $\mathrm{CVNRD}$ is also a lower-bound obstruction for the broad class of coordinate-wise unbiased randomized sparsification schemes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sanjeev Khanna, Aaron Putterman, Madhu Sudan. 2026-07-17. A Unified Theory of Sparsification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16126

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS