SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.17512

Maximal Eventually Different Families of Computable Functions

Abstract

Cardinal characteristics of the continuum are the cardinalities of interesting families of reals. A well-studied example is that of maximal almost disjoint (MAD) families of sets of natural numbers. Significant work has been done investigating computability-theoretic analogues of cardinal characteristics. By considering encodings of MAD families as a single `universal' set, Lempp, Miller, Nies, and Soskova (2023) studied the class of encoded MAD families. Such a class is referred to as a mass problem; one can study the relative complexity between mass problems. In Section 2, we build on the study of mass problems as analogues of cardinal characteristics. We define mass problems of maximal eventually different (MED) families of computable functions in the same way and compare them against the mass problems defined by Lempp et al. In Section 3, we survey work by Greenberg, Kuyper, and Turetsky (2019) that provides an abstract framework for cardinal characteristics and their effective counterparts. We show that this framework is suitable for obtaining results in the setting of mass problems. In Section 4, we showcase a construction by Schrittesser (2018) of an effectively closed MED family in set theory. We show that the construction is sufficiently effective that the computable members of the constructed family are MED relative to computable functions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Logan McDonald. 2026-07-20. Maximal Eventually Different Families of Computable Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17512

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO