SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.18714

$\tilde{O}$ptimal Algorithm for 2-Approximate All Pair Shortest Paths -- almost

Abstract

Given an undirected, unweighted graph $G$, we aim to compute a 2-approximation of all-pairs shortest paths (APSP). This problem admits a natural lower bound of $\Omega(n^2)$ since the output size is $\Theta(n^2)$. A central goal in this area is to achieve a running time of $O(n^2)$. Dor, Halperin, and Zwick (FOCS 1996, SICOMP 2001) designed an algorithm with a running time of $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ that guarantees a 2-approximation only for pairs at a distance of at least $O(\log n)$. Recently, Gupta (FOCS 2025) improved this bound, handling all pairs at a distance of at least $O(\log \log n)$. We nearly resolve this problem. We design a randomized algorithm that runs in $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ time and, with high probability, guarantees a 2-approximation for all pairs at distance at least $c$, where $c \ge 0$ is a constant. Unlike the above two results, which were purely combinatorial, our algorithm combines combinatorial techniques with fast matrix multiplication (FMM).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Manoj Gupta, Mrigankashekhar Shandilya. 2026-07-21. $\tilde{O}$ptimal Algorithm for 2-Approximate All Pair Shortest Paths -- almost. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18714

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS