Approximating $\delta$-Dispersion

Tom Janßen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.19053

Approximating $\delta$-Dispersion

Tom Janßen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider a continuous facility location problem called $\delta$-Dispersion. For some fixed $\delta > 0$, the goal is to place as many facilities on a graph as possible with pairwise distance at least $\delta$. The facilities may be located on the vertices of the graph, or the interior of the edges. This problem can be interpreted as a continuous version of the well-known Independent Set problem. Its approximation behavior is very similar for large values of $\delta$. Notably, Grigoriev et al. [Algorithmica 21] showed that $\delta$-Dispersion is solvable in polynomial time when $\delta = 1/x$ or $\delta = 2/x$ for a natural number $x$ and NP-hard otherwise. We study the approximability of $\delta$-Dispersion depending on the value of $\delta$. For $\delta > 2$, we show poly-APX-hardness, while for all $\delta < 2$ that are not solvable in polynomial time we show APX-hardness. Thanks to a translation theorem for $\delta$ due to Hartmann et al. [MFCS 22], we may focus our attention for approximation algorithms on the intervals $(2/3 , 1)$ and $(1, 2)$. We provide several approximation algorithms with an approximation factor approaching $1$ as $\delta$ approaches one of the interval boundaries. Surprisingly, the behavior as $\delta$ approaches $2/3$ from above is different: As our hardness reductions reveal, it is impossible (under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions) to construct an approximation algorithm with an approximation factor approaching $1$ as $\delta$ approaches $2/3$ from above.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Tom Janßen. 2026-07-21. Approximating $\delta$-Dispersion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19053

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗