SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.19357

Stochastic Primal-Dual Decoding for Multiobjective Generative Recommender Systems

Abstract

Recent advances in recommender systems (RS) have shown substantial performance gains through generative modelling. In practice, recommendation often involves constructing slates -- ordered lists of items -- that must satisfy multiple objectives beyond relevance, such as constraints defined over item attributes or fairness constraints. Existing multiobjective approaches either rely on post-processing techniques designed for non-generative settings, or incorporate auxiliary objectives directly into model training. The former does not explicitly account for the sequential nature of generative RS, while the latter is often impractical in large-scale systems. We propose a lightweight, inference-time decoding layer that augments autoregressive generative RS to support multiobjective slate generation without modifying or retraining the underlying model. We formulate decoding as an online constrained optimisation problem, where items are selected sequentially, and trade-offs between relevance and auxiliary objectives are adjusted dynamically based on the remaining constraint slack, i.e., how much of each objective remains to be satisfied. This is implemented via a stochastic primal-dual approximation scheme that balances relevance and auxiliary objectives during generation. We provide theoretical guarantees on constraint violation and regret, and evaluate the proposed approach through extensive offline experiments and a large-scale online A/B experiment in a real-world recommender system. Our results show consistent improvements in multiobjective trade-offs, including a +1.8\% gain in the auxiliary objectives achieved at zero cost to user satisfaction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dmitrii Moor, Ben Carterette, Senthilkumar Krishnamoorthy, Kyle Kretschman, Denis Beslic, Melissa Yalla, Alice Y Wang, Mounia Lalmas. 2026-05-26. Stochastic Primal-Dual Decoding for Multiobjective Generative Recommender Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19357

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI