Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.20452

AINTMA: Agentic AI Architecture for Autonomous Test Management with Generative Intelligence, Secure Cloud Communication and Adaptive Quality Analytics

Vinil Pasupuleti·Shyalendar Reddy Allala·Siva Rama Krishna Varma Bayyavarapu·Shrey Tyagi·Srinivasateja Songa
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Modern software quality assurance demands intelligent, autonomous systems capable of adaptive decision-making across distributed cloud environments. This paper presents AINTMA (Agentic Intelligent Test Management Architecture), a multi-agent agentic AI system that transforms traditional test management into an autonomous quality intelligence ecosystem. AINTMA deploys six specialized AI agents (Test Discovery, Risk Assessment, Reinforcement Learning Prioritization, Execution Orchestration, Generative Quality Intelligence, and Cloud Security Monitor) coordinated through a secure multi-agent communication framework over a cloud-native microservices infrastructure. The Generative Quality Intelligence agent employs large language models to produce plain language quality narratives, defect risk summaries, and data-augmented test recommendations. The RL Prioritization agent models test selection as a Markov Decision Process, learning contextual policies from large-scale historical test execution data (47 features, rolling 36-month window). Secure cloud communication is enforced through a zero-trust API gateway with OAuth2/JWT authentication, encrypted inter-agent messaging, and multi-tenant isolation. Evaluation across 12 heterogeneous software projects over 18 months demonstrates: 88.4% test prioritization accuracy (APFD, vs. 51.2% random, 82.1% best commercial baseline); 43% test cycle time reduction; defect escape rate reduced from 8.3% to 2.1%; 340% ROI at 9-month payback. The agentic architecture scales to 50,000+ test cases with sub-400ms response time, and the generative intelligence module achieves 4.3/5.0 developer usefulness rating. AINTMA demonstrates that agentic AI, combining autonomous multi-agent coordination, generative intelligence and secure smart connectivity, can fundamentally advance software quality management in cloud-scale enterprise environments.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vinil Pasupuleti, Shyalendar Reddy Allala, Siva Rama Krishna Varma Bayyavarapu, Shrey Tyagi, Srinivasateja Songa. 2026-05-14. AINTMA: Agentic AI Architecture for Autonomous Test Management with Generative Intelligence, Secure Cloud Communication and Adaptive Quality Analytics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20452

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗