Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.23118

Pure Pairing Heaps

Robert E. Tarjan·Xiaoyang Xu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The pairing heap is a "self-adjusting" implementation of a heap (priority queue) that is widely used in practice because it is simple and efficient. We introduce and analyze a simplified version of the pairing heap that we call the pure pairing heap. Our innovation is to eliminate the assembly pass during delete-min operations. We obtain the following amortized time bounds for operations on pure pairing heaps: $O(\log n)$ time per delete-min, $O(\log\log n \cdot \log\log\log n)$ time per decrease-key operation, and $O(1)$ time for each insert or meld. These bounds match those recently obtained for a more complicated version of pairing heaps, the multipass pairing heap}. These bounds also match the known lower bounds for self-adjusting heaps, except for the decrease-key bound, which is within a factor of $\log\log\log n$ of the lower bound. The main novelty in our analysis is to partition heap items into groups and to analyze each group separately. Our analysis extends to give the same bounds for lazy pairing heaps, a multitree version of pairing heaps.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert E. Tarjan, Xiaoyang Xu. 2026-07-25. Pure Pairing Heaps. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23118

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗