SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.23198

Variance-Preserving Orthogonal Selection (VPOS): Greedy Feature Selection via Orthogonal Deflation in PCA Loading Space

Abstract

We present Variance-Preserving Orthogonal Selection (VPOS), an unsupervised feature-selection method that performs sequential orthogonal deflation in the variance-weighted principal component analysis (PCA) loading space $\mathbf{V}_d\mathbf{\Lambda}_d^{1/2}$. After each feature is selected, its loading direction is projected out of all remaining candidates, so subsequent selections cover complementary directions of the rank-$d$ covariance approximation while returning original variables. We establish rank-reduction guarantees and a determinant-growth interpretation, and distinguish VPOS from greedy selection on raw data, unweighted eigenvector pivoting, Principal Feature Analysis (PFA), and Principal Variable Selection (PVS). Experiments enforce $k\leq d$, tune method-specific parameters on validation observations, and evaluate on unseen outer folds. Across seven labelled benchmarks, VPOS improves held-out normalised reconstruction error over matched PCA without deflation on every dataset, with reductions of 1--78%. It obtains the lowest mean reconstruction error on Wine, Breast Cancer, and MNIST and is within 1.7% of the lowest error on CIFAR-10 and HighDim. On CIFAR-10, VPOS is approximately 24$\times$ faster than the closely related PVS baseline while incurring a 1.7% reconstruction gap. These results establish VPOS as an efficient covariance-coverage method, particularly when correlated high-dimensional data must be represented by a small set of identifiable original variables.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Baran Koseoglu, Berrin Yanikoglu. 2026-07-25. Variance-Preserving Orthogonal Selection (VPOS): Greedy Feature Selection via Orthogonal Deflation in PCA Loading Space. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23198

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG