Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2607.24814

Aletheia: An Offline-First Clinical Decision Support System for Differential Diagnosis in Low-Resource Healthcare Settings

Joseph Walusimbi·Ann Move Oguti·Abubakhari Sserwadda·Precious Boss Kasasira·Charles Brian Okoboi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Access to specialist clinical expertise remains severely limited across sub-Saharan Africa, where physician-to-patient ratios can fall below 1:25,000 in rural settings. Existing AI-assisted diagnostic tools predominantly require reliable internet connectivity and high-specification hardware, rendering them impractical for frontline healthcare workers in district hospitals and health centres. This paper presents Aletheia, an offline-first clinical decision support system designed for low-resource healthcare contexts across sub-Saharan Africa. Aletheia is built upon Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, fine-tuned using Quantised Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) on a curated dataset of 27,000 clinical reasoning samples spanning 50 disease conditions with elevated prevalence in East Africa. Evaluation demonstrates a Top-1 diagnostic accuracy of 80% (8 of 10 cases; 95% CI: 49.0-94.3%), Top-3 accuracy of 100% (10 of 10 cases; 95% CI: 72.2-100%), BERTScore-F1 of 0.909, and METEOR of 0.467. These diagnostic figures are computed over a deliberately small set of ten representative clinical case categories, one case each, and are therefore indicative rather than statistically robust; the wide confidence intervals should be read alongside them. The system achieves an Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of 0.275 and passes the Africa Deep Tech Challenge 2026 (ADTC 2026) memory budget constraint of 7168 MB, achieving a peak inference RAM of approximately 3630 MB on the standardised benchmark laptop. These results demonstrate the feasibility of deploying large language model-based clinical reasoning at the primary care level in resource-constrained settings without cloud infrastructure.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.LGq-bio.OT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Joseph Walusimbi, Ann Move Oguti, Abubakhari Sserwadda, Precious Boss Kasasira, Charles Brian Okoboi. 2026-07-14. Aletheia: An Offline-First Clinical Decision Support System for Differential Diagnosis in Low-Resource Healthcare Settings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24814

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Low-rank adaptation methodcs.AI subjectcs.LG subjectq-bio.OT subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗