Inapproximability of Unique-Machine Precedence Scheduling for Unit-Length Jobs

Abstract

The Unique-Machine Precedence Scheduling (UMPS) problem, introduced by [DKRSTZ22], seeks a makespan-minimizing schedule of precedence-constrained jobs when each job has a unique eligible machine. On the one hand, UMPS generalizes job shop scheduling by allowing the precedence graph to be an arbitrary DAG rather than a disjoint union of chains. On the other hand, UMPS admits approximation-preserving reductions to scheduling problems with communication delays, including the job-job delay model [DKRSTZ22] and the job-machine delay model [RSY23]. Despite its central role, the approximability of UMPS has remained poorly understood: even for unit-length jobs, known scheduling techniques do not seem to yield a non-trivial approximation, and the existence of a polylogarithmic approximation was left open by [DKRSTZ22]. On the hardness side, the previous best lower bound for unit-length jobs was only the 5/4 inherited from job shop scheduling [WHHHLSS97]. We prove that unit-length UMPS is NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor. We further show that, assuming NP is not in quasi-polynomial time, unit-length UMPS admits no polynomial-time $(\log n)^\gamma$-approximation for some constant $\gamma>0$. Via the known reductions from UMPS, these lower bounds also transfer to the corresponding unit-length communication-delay scheduling models. Our proof proceeds via a reduction from a hypergraph coloring promise problem. In the yes case, the input hypergraph admits a balanced coloring, while in the no case, the hypergraph has no large independent set. Instantiating this reduction with the hardness of [GL18] gives arbitrary constant-factor inapproximability, while combining the $4$-colorable $4$-uniform hypergraph coloring hardness of [GHHSV17] with a certain composition operation for hypergraphs yields the polylogarithmic factor inapproximability.