SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.27040

Upper Bounds for In-Place Sorting with Minimal Moves

Abstract

We present the first in-place comparison-based sorting algorithm that sorts an array of $n$ elements using $n\lg n + O(n)$ comparisons with exponentially high probability and always $O(n)$ moves. This matches the information-theoretic lower bound up to an additive linear term despite making only linear moves and working in-place. For the worst-case, we present an algorithm that makes $n\lg n + O(n\lg^{(t)}n)$ comparisons and $O(tn)$ data moves, where $t$ is an integer parameter satisfying $2 \leq t \leq \lg^{*}n - 1$ and $\lg^{(t)}n$ denotes the $t$-time iterated logarithm, improving over the previous upper bound of $n\lg n + O(n\lg\lg n)$ comparisons and $O(n)$ moves when using constant $t>2$. We thus achieve the ultimate goal of minimal move in-place sorting via randomization whilst narrowing the gap to this goal in the worst-case. This advance primarily relies on a novel ordered set structure that supports searches in an optimal $\lg n + O(1)$ comparisons for $n$ elements.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alex Zihan Xu, Stephen Jing Chick. 2026-07-29. Upper Bounds for In-Place Sorting with Minimal Moves. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27040

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS