SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.28131

Nonfundamentalness or missing information ? Evidence from causal-noncausal VARs in macro-finance

Abstract

This paper studies the presence of noncausal dynamics in standard macro-finance VAR models and asks whether they reflect genuine nonfundamentalness or omitted information available to economic agents but unobserved by the econometrician. To that end, we introduce a factor-filtering mixed causal-noncausal VARX approach designed to account for common macroeconomic information. We assess its performance in simulated settings, while showing also that the generalized covariance (GCov) estimator correctly recovers causal and noncausal dynamics when using several lags. Empirically, we revisit the well-known Stock-Watson monetary policy (S)VAR and show that the noncausal components detected in the baseline specification largely disappear once common factors are filtered out. Finally, we compare impulse responses from the filtered and original data to assess the transmission of monetary policy shocks and show that filtering further removes the price puzzle.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lison Christiaens, Julien Hambuckers, Alain Hecq. 2026-07-30. Nonfundamentalness or missing information ? Evidence from causal-noncausal VARs in macro-finance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28131

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM