SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.28819

A Matrix Factorization Approach in Turnstile Streaming

Abstract

We define the $M$-point query problem in data streams. Given a fixed matrix $M$, the goal is to maintain a vector $x$ under turnstile updates and answer each query $u$ with an estimate $\widehat{y}_u$ satisfying $|y_u-\widehat{y}_u| \leq \varepsilon \|x\|_1$, where $y=Mx$. We show that if $M$ admits a factorization $M=AB$, where $A$ and $B$ have space-efficient representations, then there is a streaming algorithm using $O(\varepsilon^{-1}\|A\|_{2\rightarrow\infty}\|B\|_{1\rightarrow 1}+(\varepsilon^{-1}\|A\|_{\infty\rightarrow\infty}\|B\|_{1\rightarrow 1})^{2/3})$ words of memory. An important special case is the lower-triangular all-ones matrix, which corresponds to the quantiles problem with additive error $\pm \varepsilon n$, where $n$ is the database size. Our framework generalizes the dyadic approach of Cormode and Muthukrishnan (J. Algorithms, 2005) for turnstile quantiles, and simplifies and improves the analysis of the state-of-the-art dyadic CountSketch algorithms of Wang et al. (SIGMOD, 2013) and Luo et al. (VLDB, 2016). Our approach is also related to the matrix mechanism of Li et al. (VLDB J., 2015) in differential privacy: given a database $x\in\mathbb{R}^U$ and a matrix $M$, the mechanism outputs a private approximation to $Mx$, with the privacy-error tradeoff governed by a matrix factorization norm of $M$. We also improve the prior lower bound for quantiles with deletions, showing a memory lower bound of $\Omega(\varepsilon^{-1}\log U)$ words. We also show any factorization has $\|A\|_{2\rightarrow\infty}\|B\|_{1\rightarrow 1} = \Omega((\log^{1.5} U) / \log\log U)$. This lower bound is new, and shows that for quantiles, the dyadic CountSketch is nearly optimal amongst factorization-based approaches.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jan Bulanek, Ravi Kumar, Raghu Meka, Jelani Nelson, Tamas Sarlos. 2026-07-30. A Matrix Factorization Approach in Turnstile Streaming. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28819

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS