SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2607.29349

The $\delta$-calculus: from distinction to arithmetic

Abstract

Let $\delta$ denote the primitive act of distinction, formally realized as the one-step extension $r\mapsto Sr$ of a finite record. We prove that the $\delta$-orbit is initial among $\delta$-algebras: every $\delta$-algebra admits a unique structure-preserving map from the orbit. The map is injective when the successor operation is injective and the base point is not a successor. If the $\delta$-algebra also satisfies induction for all predicates, the map is bijective and gives the unique isomorphism with the generated $\delta$-orbit. The $\delta$-calculus is an intuitionistic first-order proof system over the signature $\{0,S,+,\cdot\}$. Each derivation carries a ledger recording the use of the law of excluded middle, the limited principle of omniscience, Markov's principle, and induction on quantified formulas. Every closed formula derivable in the forced fragment is true in the standard model. Starting from $\delta$, we construct the choice-free number tower $\delta \leadsto \mathbb{N}_\delta \hookrightarrow \mathbb{Z}_\delta \hookrightarrow \mathbb{Q}_\delta$. The metatheoretic systems $\mathbb{N}$, $\mathbb{Z}$, and $\mathbb{Q}$ each admit an explicit injection into $\mathbb{N}_\delta$. Under the law of excluded middle, every recognizer is either injective or has kernel congruence $\equiv_{i,p}$ for a unique pair $i\geq0$, $p\geq1$. In the noninjective case, the quotient is a finite monogenic monoid $M(i,p)$. A decidable congruence together with an explicit pair of distinct related elements implies the classification without additional nonconstructive principles. For a decidable congruence different from equality, Markov's principle is needed. For an arbitrary congruence, the dichotomy requires the law of excluded middle. The reverse implications show that the last two prices are exact. They are distinct from the syntactic ledger of derivations in the $\delta$-calculus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jonathan Washburn, Milan Zlatanović. 2026-07-31. The $\delta$-calculus: from distinction to arithmetic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29349

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO