SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.00140

Discrepancy Theory: An Algorithmic and Geometric Perspective

Abstract

Combinatorial discrepancy theory is a subject with roots in combinatorics, geometry, and number theory, and with numerous applications to mathematics and computer science. At its core, discrepancy theory is about dividing a collection of objects into two parts that are as balanced as possible. For example, given a collection of subsets of a finite universe, we may wish to color the elements with two colors so that each set is approximately evenly split. Other problems in discrepancy are more geometric in flavor, and ask for example, to assign signs to a collection of vectors, so that the sum of the signed vectors is as small as possible. Classical results, such as the Beck-Fiala theorem and Spencer's "six deviations" result, show that it is often possible to attain remarkably small discrepancy, often far smaller than what naive random colorings achieve. In recent years, discrepancy theory has undergone a transformation, driven by new algorithmic techniques and a rich interplay between probability, optimization, and convex geometry. These developments have led not only to new constructive proofs of foundational theorems, but also to several new results and research directions. This monograph aims to provide an accessible and unified introduction to these modern developments, with a focus on the core algorithmic and convex geometric ideas that have driven them. For several results, we provide new simpler analyses, while highlighting the intuition behind the proofs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nikhil Bansal, Aleksandar Nikolov. 2026-07-31. Discrepancy Theory: An Algorithmic and Geometric Perspective. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00140

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO